Geopolitical Tensions & $100 Oil Impacts

China Weighs Solar Export Curbs to the U.S.
China is considering possible restrictions on exports of solar manufacturing equipment to the United States, though no decision has been made yet. The move would expand Beijing’s export controls beyond rare earths to another sector in which China is a global leader. The discussions come as U.S. companies work to expand domestic solar manufacturing and reduce dependence on Chinese supply chains. If China moves forward, the restrictions could make it more difficult or expensive for U.S. solar manufacturers to scale production. For the U.S. oil and gas industry, that could be a positive, as slower renewable buildout may help support continued demand for traditional energy sources.

$100 Oil Could Deliver Major Windfall for Producers
An analysis cited by The Guardian suggests that if oil prices average $100 per barrel through year-end, the world’s largest oil and gas companies and major producing countries could collect an additional $234 billion in windfall profits. Saudi Aramco, Kuwait Petroleum, ExxonMobil, Chevron, and major Russian producers are expected to be among the biggest beneficiaries as elevated prices boost free cash flow.

Oil and Gas Workers See Strong Demand Tailwind
Matt Coday, founder of the Oil and Gas Workers Association, said the industry is in a strong position as global conflict continues to highlight the importance of reliable energy supply. He noted that workers across the sector are encouraged by rising demand for the products they produce, suggesting continued momentum for the U.S. oil and gas industry as energy security remains a major focus.

Energy Market Perspective

Why the U.S. Blockade Matters for U.S. Energy Investors
The U.S. blockade of Iranian ports is not just a geopolitical story. It is a market story. With Iranian exports disrupted and traffic through the Strait of Hormuz reduced, the world is being reminded how quickly global energy flows can be thrown off balance. Reuters reports that the blockade is already affecting shipping tied to Iran, adding fresh pressure to oil markets at a time when supply reliability matters more than ever.

For U.S. energy, this is constructive in the near term. When global buyers start questioning Middle East supply security, U.S. crude and LNG become more attractive because they come from a more stable and dependable source. That can strengthen demand for American energy exports and improve the outlook for U.S. producers, exporters, and infrastructure tied to moving those barrels and molecules to market.

For investors, the bigger point is that energy is doing what it often does in times of geopolitical stress: reasserting its strategic value. Higher oil prices can create inflation pressure and volatility across the broader market, but they also remind investors that exposure to U.S. energy can serve an important role when supply risk rises globally. The International Energy Agency said in its April 2026 report that higher prices and trade disruptions are already weighing on demand expectations, which is exactly why secure domestic supply becomes more valuable in periods like this.

Ask the "Tax Guy"

Understanding how oil and gas wells are owned is critical because ownership structure can significantly affect both economics and tax treatment. Whether an investor holds a direct working interest, an indirect interest through a partnership, or a passive royalty interest, the way that ownership is structured can influence cost exposure, revenue participation, reporting obligations, and potential self-employment tax liability. This distinction is especially important for investors evaluating not only the return potential of an oil and gas investment, but also its after-tax impact. We asked our EVP of Tax, Rex Gifford:

Q. How may the structure of direct or indirect ownership of oil and gas wells impact economic and tax considerations?

A: Domestically, oil and gas wells may generally be owned in one of two ways:

1. Working Interest (WI)
This gives the owner the right, and the obligation, to explore, drill, develop, and operate the well. The owner pays a proportionate share of all costs, including drilling, completion, operating, maintenance, and taxes, and in return receives a corresponding share of the revenue from production. A working interest may be either operated, where you or your company runs the well, or non-operated, where you partner with an operator who handles the day-to-day work.

2. Royalty Interest (RI) or Mineral Interest
This is a passive ownership interest in the oil and gas minerals beneath the surface. Upon negotiation of an oil and gas lease or assignment, the owner typically receives an initial lease bonus payment based on the number of mineral acres leased or acquired, along with a percentage of production revenue in the form of a royalty, without bearing drilling or operating costs. Royalty interests are often created when a mineral owner leases rights to an oil and gas company in exchange for an upfront bonus and ongoing royalties, which typically range from 12.5% to 25%. Overriding royalty interests (ORRI) and non-participating royalty interests are related variations that may be carved out separately.

Wells are typically tied to a lease, which is a contract granting drilling rights on a specific tract of land. Ownership may also be fractional, with multiple individuals or entities often sharing interests in the same well or lease through joint operating agreements.

For direct acquisition of a working interest, production revenue is generally reported by the owner as a sole proprietor on Schedule C of Form 1040. In addition, because net profits from a sole proprietorship are generally treated as self-employment earnings, those profits are subject to self-employment tax. At present, the self-employment tax rate is generally 15.3% of net earnings, subject to applicable limitations and thresholds.

For indirect ownership of a working interest, such as through a limited partnership, the tax treatment may differ. Generally, general partners may be subject to self-employment tax on partnership earnings, while limited partners are generally not subject to self-employment tax on the same basis. Accordingly, if the governing Limited Partnership Agreement includes a provision allowing for the conversion of a general partner interest into a limited partner interest by mutual consent as of a specified date, the allocation of self-employment earnings may potentially be reduced or avoided from that point forward. In that circumstance, ownership through a limited partnership structure may help avoid the additional burden of self-employment tax.

In connection with such a conversion from general partner to limited partner, IRC Section 721(a) generally provides that no gain or loss is recognized when a partner contributes property to a partnership in exchange for an interest in that partnership. In Revenue Ruling 84-52, the IRS addressed the conversion of a general partnership into a limited partnership and concluded that, so long as the partnership continues its operations and the partners’ percentage interests remain unchanged, the conversion does not constitute a sale or exchange, and no gain or loss is recognized under Section 721.

As described above, direct ownership of a working interest may result in ongoing self-employment tax liability during the period of ownership, whereas properly structured indirect ownership of a working interest will eliminate such liability.

Have a tax question you’d like covered in a future issue? Email it to theupside@kingoperating.com.

DISCLOSURE: For educational purposes only. Not tax, legal or accounting advice. Please consult your tax professional before making any investment or tax-related decisions.

Happening at King